Today, in just a few hours I will exercise my voting right as I participate in perhaps the greatest political experiment in the history of the world, the American government.
If I don’t vote today, somebody else will. I can’t trust somebody else to inform my government of my values.
I will vote with conviction and joy.
My conviction is not to a political party or ideal it is of a value that I believe expresses consistency in Scripture and is logically in order. I strive to think with reason and purpose.
I will vote with joy in Christ, my King. I am pleased to be an active participant, not a passive observer and I’m pleased that Almighty God is appointing rulers and leaders for his Glory not as an unaware passive entity giving simple permissions. All things will be according to His glory and I’m convinced with the good of His bride, the church, in mind.
In Idaho, I am voting no on both propositions.
Reasoning on Proposition One:
- To vote yes just because other “conservatives” are voting yes or wanting me to vote yes, is naive at best. They want to suggest that the only people voting against proposition one are casino owners. My vote of “no” on proposition one is not in alignment with casino owners, it is a “no” vote because of moral conviction based on the highly addictive behavior of gambling and the disingenuous promotion of gambling being good for the society based on promises of public good the revenue will bring to the state.
- This voter will not be won over by the argument of “just because I don’t gamble, why keep others from gambling.” This logic doesn’t work for me.
- I am morally opposed to dog fighting, cockfighting, illegal drug production, on and on. Will I exercise the same logic to this that promoters of Proposition One want to suggest? No, I am not persuaded of this kind of passive voting. I vote with conviction. I want all to feel free to vote with conviction. Even if our votes cancel each other out.
- This voter will not be won over by the argument of “just because I don’t gamble, why keep others from gambling.” This logic doesn’t work for me.
Reasoning on Proposition Two:
- I am not convinced that government funded or government subsidized health care is beneficial to all citizens.
- I respect that we may need to assist some citizens with health care. This is a kindness to those in complex financial days. But, I’m not convinced of giving something to the bulk of the population when personal responsibility of all citizens is a greater blessing to the whole of the state. To borrow money from others to pay for the irresponsible behavior of a people is further down the path to moral and financial bankruptcy.
I am a registered voter. I am registered as a Constitutional Party voter. However, my loyalty is not to the Constitutional Party. My loyalty is to my personal God who influences my convictions and values. These convictions and values do instruct my voting. If I were to say otherwise would be a contradiction against my conscience. I can stand in line in a few hours with neighbors who will agree and disagree with me. I will shake their hands, I will talk about our neighborhood, I will watch out for them, I will help them all regardless of our similar or differing convictions. But I will not trust anyone with my vote.
See you at the pole!
post publish edit for spelling and grammar.